Verizon Stretching Phone Subsidy Waiting Period to Two Full Years

Read the post at Forbes.comScreen-Shot-2013-04-12-at-4.09.08-PM

 

Posted in Article | Comments Off

Google and Nixle Team Up For Public Safety Alerts

LAPD is one of the agencies that uses Nixle to send alerts

LAPD is one of the agencies that uses Nixle to send alerts

Google and Nixle are working together to help people better respond to emergency situations in their communities and schools.

Emergency alerts, about crimes in progress, lock-downs, natural disasters, missing children and other events will now show up when people do relevant searches on Google web search, maps and Google Now:

  • Google Search: Search a location or keyword triggering an active Nixle alert, the alert will be visible at the top of search results with the ablity to click for more information.
  • Google Maps: Search a location on Google Maps and the active Nixle alert will be pinned to that geography.
  • Google Now: Android phones within the affected community will display the Nixle alert directly on the phone through Google Now

(Source Nixle)

San Francisco-based Nixle is a public safety communications platform used by more than 6,500 public service agencies including police, fire departments and emergency management services.  The National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (where I serve as a board member) uses Nixle for missing children alerts as a supplement to its Amber alerts.

Schools too

Nixle also works with schools, according to spokesperson Jim Gatta, who use the service to notify parents and other community members on a wide range of issues from day-to-day event notifications to school lock-downs  Nixle also provides schools and police departments with anonymous reporting systems for crimes, bullying or potential self-harm.

(Disclosure: I’m co-director of ConnectSafely.org, a non-profit Internet safety organization that receives financial support from Google).

 This article first appeared on Forbes.com

Posted in Article | Comments Off

How Tech Helps and Harms Our Environment

This post is adapted and expanded from one that appeared in the San Jose Mercury News

by Larry Magid

Update: Click below to listen to Larry’s 1-minute CBS News segment with author Frances Moore Lappé

 

As we get ready to celebrate Earth Day on April 22, I can’t help but think about how technology both helps and harms our environment.

On the positive side, tech is helping cut down on the use of some resources. Reading newspapers and documents on screens means chopping down fewer trees for paper. Using email cuts down on the environmental cost not just of paper and envelopes but all the fuel it takes to get a letter from place to place. The ability to telecommute or participate in an online conference reduces fuel consumption and carbon emissions.

And, of course, it is technology that’s enabling electric cars and hybrids, and more efficient heating, lighting and cooling systems. Sensor technology enables us to have lights turn on only when needed and off a few seconds later.

We have a lot more electronic devices, but the good news is that they are getting increasingly efficient. Still, globally, our demand for electricity is growing at the rate of 2.4 percent a year. That doesn’t sound like much, but it compounds over time, which means a doubling of consumption between 2000 and 2030. Much of that growth is in developing nations. The U.S. Energy Information Administration projects annual U.S. consumption growth at only 0.8 percent between now and 2040 which is a much slower rate than we’ve experienced over the past 50 years. And much of that slowdown in growth has to do with more efficient technology.

Incandescent bulbs are rapidly on their way to extinction, which is a good thing. CFL bulbs are about 75 percent more efficient and LED bulbs — which are starting to come down in price but are still quite expensive — are even more efficient, generate almost no heat and last a lot longer, which means having to manufacture, ship — and screw in — fewer of them over time. The U.S. Department of Energy estimates that widespread use of LED lighting could save the “equivalent annual electrical output of 44 large electric power plants,” saving “more than $30 billion at today’s electricity prices.”

Other electronic devices, including audio systems and TVs, are also getting more energy-efficient, but collectively they still consume a lot of power. And just because something is more efficient than what it replaced, that doesn’t mean we should leave it on all the time. I used to think there was no need to turn off my solid-state audio system until I measured its energy use with a Kill A Watt EZ energy meter and discovered it was using a whopping 47 watts. My DVD player was sucking up 26 watts in idle mode and my digital video recorder, which had to run all the time so it could record shows, used 30 watts.

A few years ago the Energy Department estimated that, in the average home, 40 percent of all electricity used to power home electronics is consumed while the products are turned off. Some of this standby power, sometimes called “vampire power,” is sucked up by appliances such as TVs that sip energy so that they’ll work with a remote control and turn on almost instantly. The number of “always on” devices will skyrocket over time as more and more are connected to networks and always in “listening mode” for remote commands.

Industry efforts, government regulations and voluntary programs like the International Energy Agency’s “1-watt initiative” are helping to reduce standby power, but the rest of us can do our part by switching off devices that don’t need to be on and unplugging all those power bricks (like the ones that power our phones) that use small amounts of power even when they’re not in use. A simple trick is to connect them to a power strip that you can switch off when you’re not charging anything.

We also need to pressure companies to be more energy-efficient. You might not be using much power when you access the Internet on your energy-efficient laptop or mobile phone, but worldwide, according to the New York Times, “digital warehouses use about 30 billion watts of electricity, roughly equivalent to the output of 30 nuclear power plants.”

McKinsey & Co., according to the Times, found that on average these data centers “were using only 6 percent to 12 percent of the electricity powering their servers to perform computations. The rest was essentially used to keep servers idling and ready in case of a surge in activity that could slow or crash their operations.”

Finally — and I admit I’m often guilty of buying the latest versions of gadgets — we need to think about slowing down the replacement cycle. Every time we replace our cellphone or tablet it means that another one has to be manufactured and shipped to us, and our old one needs eventually to be recycled. All of that takes resources.

As we crave those new devices that I and other tech journalists frequently laud, we need to think of the total cost of ownership — not just for us personally, but for the world and the planet we live on.

 

Posted in Article | Comments Off

Yes, There is Google After Death

Unlike you, your digital remains can now live forever. Google is now offering users of Gmail, Google Plus and other services a way to control their digital afterlife.

Read more on Forbes.com

Posted in Article | Comments Off

Can Samsung’s 6.3-Inch “Phablet” Replace a Tablet

Samsung Galaxy Mega (Credit: Samsung)

Samsung Galaxy Mega (Credit: Samsung)

by Larry Magid

Samsung just introduced a pair of new smartphones called “Mega.” The largest one measures 6.3 inches (diagonally) which is only 0.7 inches smaller than Samsung’s 7-inch Galaxy tablet.   The new phones, called the Galaxy Mega, will run Android 4.2 (Jelly Bean).

For comparison, the iPhone 5 has a 4-inch screen while Samsung’s popular Galaxy S3 has a 4.8-inch screen.

A “phablet” (cross between a phone and a tablet) is small enough to fit in most pockets, but it could be a tight squeeze. It’s also small enough for most people to use comfortably in their hand, but there may be those for whom it’s a bit too big. But it certainly goes against the old trend of “smaller is better,” recognizing that the human factor — having a phone that’s big enough to interact with and see – now trumps making it as small as possible.

TabTimes editor David Needle pointed out that while it’s close to the size of some tablets, “it’s close to the smallest tablets on the market.” He thinks it might  make sense as a tablet replacement “if the tablet is a supplement to a computer you’re already using like a notebook,  for simple things this might do that trick.” But he said that “if it’s more like a laptop replacement, it’s probably not very practical.”

Click below to listen to Larry’s 1-minute CBS News/CNET Tech Talk segment with TabTimes editor, David Needle

Posted in Article | Comments Off

IDC: PC Sales in Steep Decline

A report from International Data Corporation (IDC) shows a 13.9% decline in first quarter PC shipments compared to 2012.  The “year-on-year contraction marked the worst quarter since IDC began tracking the PC market quarterly in 1994,” according to IDC.

Continue reading at Forbes.com

Posted in Article | Comments Off

CBS News 1-Minute Tech Talk: Protecting our cyber physical systems

Larry speaks with Lee Holcomb of the Cyber Security Research Alliance about a recent Washington DC meeting to discuss ways to better secure our cyber physical infrastructure.

Posted in Article | Comments Off

Facebook “Phone” Could Be One More Distraction in a World Full Of Them

This post is adapted and expanded from one that appeared in the San Jose Mercury News

by Larry Magid

Facebook phone software showing "Chat Head"

Facebook phone software showing “Chat Head”

Facebook’s new “Home” family of Android apps and software offer a rich and engrossing experience for those who love Facebook, and it could help Facebook’s bottom line. But I worry that the new phone — along with the already ubiquitous mobile access to Facebook, Twitter, text messaging and email — will be one more incentive for people to pay less attention to those around them and more attention to friends, colleagues and even strangers who may be nowhere in sight.

When you pick up the new HTC “Home” phone or another Android phone equipped with the new software, the social networking service and its messaging services are, literally, in your face. While that can be a good thing — especially for heavy duty Facebook enthusiasts — it can also be yet another way to distract people from what is happening in the real time and space they’re in at the moment.

Distractions have been with us forever

Of course, you don’t need one of these Facebook-on-steroids phones to be distracted. There are plenty of existing smartphone apps that notify us when friends or colleagues are nearby, and others that interrupt us the moment a friend posts a tweet or message on Facebook. I use such apps on my phone, but turn off beeps or vibrations when new tweets, emails or Facebook messages arrive.

Listen to Larry’s interview with “Mediatrician” Dr. Michael Rich on distractions, disorders and Internet addiction

Even many old fashioned “feature phones” offer texting, email and social apps. And long before cell phones, some people were unable to ignore a ringing phone, even if it meant interrupting dinner or an in-person conversation. But with this new phone and software, Facebook is taking distraction to a new level.

A couple of years ago, I sat at a restaurant across from a large group of 20-somethings. Of the 15 or so people sitting at the table, at least 10 of them were texting, checking email or using apps. I wondered why they bothered to go out to dinner together.

Although it annoys my wife, I too sometimes text or check email, Facebook or Twitter when I’m eating dinner or otherwise interacting with friends, family or colleagues. I’m still married and gainfully employed, but it causes me to wonder where to draw the line between acceptable use of technology vs. excessive or compulsive use. So I consulted experts in the fields of obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and attention deficit disorder (ADD). Both confirmed that there is a range or spectrum of sorts between “normal” and excessive or compulsive use of mobile technology,

It depends on the person

Dr. Jeff Szymanski, a clinical psychologist and executive director of the International OCD Foundation said both intent and outcome are important factors.

“If a sports editor checks scores several times a day, it might make sense,” he said. But if it’s not a job requirement and you do it so often that it “interferes with your work, your relationships and your day-to-day functioning,” it could be an unhealthy compulsive behavior.

Szymanski said that norms and commercial pressure can affect behavior. He gave the example of how Purell and Lysol promote the widespread use hand- sanitizing dispensers. That’s helpful for the companies’ bottom line and does help prevent the spread of colds and flu, but it can also reinforce the obsession of those with a disorder that makes them feel compelled to constantly wash their hands.

Likewise, some users may find it helpful that Facebook puts social media on the home screen of its phone. But for others, it could heighten the compulsive tendency to check their messages and newsfeed so often it interferes with their social and family relationships or their jobs. I’m not saying there’s anything wrong with hand sanitizers or social networking phones but, like many things, they can be used excessively or inappropriately.

Robin Maier, a Tampa-based licensed clinical social worker, who has blogged about ADD and texting, worries that excessive messaging can “affect personal relationships.” In an interview, she said she sees patients for whom it’s a serious problem and that some of her teenage patients say that they have teachers “who answer their phones and text all day long,” when they should be focused on teaching. Like Szymanski, she said the line between acceptable and inappropriate use is determined by whether or not it is interfering with life, work or study and relationships.

There are certainly lots of good reasons for people to be in constant touch with the “outside” world. Anne Collier, who is my co-director at ConnectSafely.org, argues that for some, especially those who use it for marketing and business, mobile access to Facebook, email and texting “can reduce stress because they don’t have to be chained to their desk or laptop to see their messages or what’s happening on their Facebook page.”  I would add that that is true for social life as well. My daughter recently checked her text messaging while on a hike with her mom because she needed to confirm a dinner appointment that night. Once she knew and when where she was meeting her friend, she was able to relax and enjoy the rest of the hike.

Everyone I interviewed for this story acknowledged that texting — even while with other people — is becoming a norm, especially among teens and young adults. But just because it is common and socially acceptable doesn’t mean it’s not disruptive of relationships, especially when taken to an extreme.

Zuckerberg weighs in

At the news conference unveiling the new family of apps, I asked Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg if he’s put thought into how ubiquitous mobile access and messaging affects “presence” — for example, being interrupted with text messages when he is out with his wife. He said Facebook’s technology affords “lighter weight communications” that could actually be less intrusive and that it “doesn’t make you less likely to call on the phone or get together.”

And even Mark Zuckerberg would “much rather be with my wife than message her,” he said.

 

Disclosure: Larry Magid is co-director of ConnectSafely.org, a non-profit Internet safety organization that receives financial support from Facebook.

Posted in Article | Tagged | Comments Off

Toshiba Shrinks the High-Resolution Camera Sensor

(Credit: Toshiba)

(Credit: Toshiba)

It’s no secret that cell phone cameras are getting a lot better.  In fact, some are good enough to rival dedicated entry level point and shoot cameras. The iPhone 5 takes very impressive pictures and — based on the published specifications — the soon to be released Samsung Galaxy S4 with its 13 megapixel camera — could be even better.

Of course part of what makes for good cell phone cameras is the ability to reduce the size of the sensor without sacrificing quality and resolution.  And to that end, Toshiba just announced what it’s billing as “the industry’s thinnest CMOS image sensor camera module with high-resolution, 13 mega pixel (MP), imaging ideal for next-generation, ultra-thin smartphones and tablet devices.”

The new chip, according to Toshiba, is able to shrink the form factor for high resolution sensors by using what the company calls a  ”flip-chip structure for the image sensor.” The technology “allows for a large number of interconnects, with shorter distances than wire, which greatly reduces assembling area and package height,” according to Toshiba.

Cell phone makers will be able to buy samples of the TCM9930MD camera module in May.

Here are more details from Toshiba.

Posted in Article | Comments Off

Dealing with spam and cyberattacks: Control Vs. Openness

This post first appeared in the San Jose Mercury News

by Larry Magid

Back in the early ’90s, then Vice President Al Gore spoke of the Internet as an “information superhighway.” While that’s a somewhat imperfect analogy, the Internet and highways do have some things in common. Both can move traffic and both can become too clogged up for traffic to move swiftly.

A traffic jam on a real highway can affect that road and any other roads that connect to it and the same can be true for the information highway.

And while most traffic jams are a result of an accident or too many vehicles (or data packets in the case of the Internet) legitimately trying to get from place to place, they can also be slowed down deliberately, as happened in Brussels last September when about 100 trucks slowed traffic entering the city as part of a planned protest.

Last week, a small Dutch Internet service provider called CyberBunker initiated a traffic jam of its own. Its apparent goal wasn’t to slow down the entire Internet but to bring down the services of Spamhaus — a spam fighting organization that had added CyberBunker to its block lists for allegedly allowing its customers to send spam around the world. CyberBunker advertises that customers “are allowed to host any content they like, except child porn and anything related to terrorism. Everything else is fine.”

According to published reports, that traffic jam affected servers around the world and impacted ordinary people thousands of miles away who weren’t able to watch online video or access other Web services as a result of a protest on another continent.

It’s a scary thought and a reminder of how this “global village” we live in is so interconnected that we can no longer afford to ignore problems that affect “other people,” because they can affect us, too. Of course that’s long been true to a certain extent — a fire in an oil field in the Middle East can affect gas prices in our Midwest; a poor wheat harvest in Kansas could affect bread prices in Russia; a storm in New York can affect air traffic in San Francisco. But on the Internet, the impact can be immediate and widespread.

This is one reason international bodies such as the United Nations hold occasional global forums like the Internet Governance Forum or the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) World Conference on International Telecommunications to talk about coordinated strategies to keep traffic flowing on our global highway. Of course, even these bodies are not without their controversy. Late last year, the United States led a coalition of countries that refused to sign an International Telecommunications Regulations treaty because it proposed regulations that many Western countries considered to be a threat to the open Internet.

Without getting into the specifics of the ITU treaty, the general issue of control vs. openness is one that needs to be looked at in light of today’s threat landscape. We need global cooperation to help thwart attacks and keep traffic moving. But we don’t need cyber police around the world stopping traffic for no legitimate reason just to see what’s in the trunk, so to speak.

Solving international cybercrime poses both legal and technical challenges. Dave Rand, who co-founded the Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS) and is now a technical fellow at Trend Micro, pointed out in an interview that it’s possible for spam to be sent from Antigua advertising a virus site in Canada with payment processed in the Virgin Islands, and with domain name servers in the United States and a fulfillment service in India.

“Where does law enforcement start?” he asked. “It’s very difficult for law enforcement to get a handle on it because there are no effective transnational laws for the Internet.” Finding a way to balance privacy, security and the legal aspect of the Internet as a whole is a “deep dark problem,” Rand said.

Rand said it’s up to the private sector to “apply appropriate pressures at the right time.” He pointed to an example from 2008, where a series of articles from then Washington Post columnist Brian Krebs pressured upstream Internet service providers into cutting off access to McColo, a San Jose-based company that was hosting spam sites. “At that moment,” said Rand, “spam on the Internet dropped by more than 50 percent.”

Rand said that it’s time to put international pressure on CyberBunker’s upstream providers that link them with the global Internet.

I might add that it’s also appropriate to continue international conversations about beefing up cross-border cooperation and international laws that can help protect the Internet. I am well aware of the potential for overregulation or oppressive laws, as we found at that last ITU meeting, but we also need to find better ways to protect our shared infrastructure while also protecting national sovereignty and an open Internet.

Posted in Article | Comments Off